• Skip to main content
  • Skip to header right navigation
  • Skip to site footer

Stephen M. Miller

Award-Winning, Bestselling Christian Author

  • Home
  • About
  • Books
  • Blog Features
  • Bible
  • Contact
Painting/photo of Jerusalem Temple-Casual English Bible

Is Bible history as good as my memory?

Stephen M. Miller
Ethiopian Christian reading Bible
MORE INSPIRATIONAL THAN ACCURATE? An Orthodox Christian priest in Ethiopia pauses to read his Bible. A good many scholars who specialize in the Bible and in Bible-land archaeology say that sometimes the Bible gets it wrong. Is it okay if they’re right? Photo by Rod Waddington, flickr, CC2.

MAYBE I SHOULD BE ASHAMED OF MYSELF, but I kind of enjoy watching Bible-land archaeologists argue with each other. I mean debate. But it’s sometimes arguing.

The fact is, I learn by reading their arguments.

One of the things they argue about is how helpful the Bible is in figuring out what actually happened in ancient times.

Some say they see the Bible as pretty doggone unhelpful, especially as it relates to the story of how the Jewish people got started as a nation.

They say they don’t see much support on the ground to substantiate what is reported in the stories we read in the book of Joshua, with the Israelites invading what is now the Holy Land.

In the current issue of Biblical Archaeology Review, May/June 2016, several archaeologists politely go at each other over this very topic in the “Queries & Comments” section.

I read some thought-provoking lines from archaeologist William G. Dever. He excavated the ruins of the ancient Canaanite city of Gezer. He’s also an archaeology prof at Lycoming College in Pennsylvania.

He took issue with Harvard prof Peter Machinist who argued that the Bible should, in fact, be seriously considered when historians are trying to figure out how the people of Israel landed in what is now Israel and the Palestinian Territories.

Dr. Dever wrote that the Bible doesn’t help there.

“The fact is precisely the opposite case for writing any new history of ancient Israel in any era. In view of the progress of our two disciplines (archaeology and Bible), the archaeological data more often illumine the Biblical text, rarely the other way around.”

He adds:

“The Hebrew Bible may sometimes help to determine how Israel ‘remembered’ it’s origins, but often the Bible has ‘invented’ these origins.”

We are left asking ourselves this question: Should we stick to our guns and consider history in the Bible as absolutely literal and thoroughly accurate?

Or is it okay to recognize the humanity of the writers and the editors who first wrote it down and then passed it along – and accept the fact that some bits of information may be simply the best they could remember, and not necessarily accurate all the time?

Or do we figure the Holy Spirit makes up the difference?

The question is a bit like the case that some Christians are making for the letters Paul wrote in the New Testament. They say that if Paul had any idea his letters were going to end up in the add-on to the Jewish Bible, he would have chosen his words more carefully. Maybe especially in the note to Timothy, telling women to keep their mouths shut in church.

Rather than give you examples of possible inaccuracies concerning the history – and there are a lot that the scholars report – I’m asking this on the basis of the principle alone:

Are you relaxed about the possibility that some of the facts reported in the Bibles we hold in our hands today might be a little off because the humans who passed them along were a little off?

Many readers – especially tradition-minded Christians – press me on matters like this. They say they want to know what I think.

I say we should stop listening to people who tell us what they think. I say we should gather as many facts as we can and then think for ourselves.

My follow-up question would be that if you have trouble with the kind of message Dr. Dever delivers, how would you make a case that all the facts are accurate when the scholars are prepared to give you a list of well-documented exceptions to that rule?

Would you be inclined to fall back on faith, or would you take the scholars on, one argument at a time?

My worry is that many Christians wouldn’t even bother to give the scholars a second thought.

If the Bible deserves to be taken seriously as a document that helps us understand ancient history, perhaps the scholars who spend their entire career getting their hands dirty by studying ancient history on the ground need to be taken seriously as well.

Truly, I’m curious what you think about that.

For more about the Bible and archaeology

  • Archaeology: Score one for the Bible
  • Myths of Genesis
  • Was Noah’s Flood just another flood myth?

Bible Gateway Blogger Grid

Share this:

  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window) Pinterest

Like this:

Like Loading...
View All Posts - Ordered by Most Recent First
« Previous
Next »

About Stephen M. Miller

STEPHEN M. MILLER is an award winning bestselling Christian author of easy-reading books about the Bible and Christianity and author of the Casual English Bible® paraphrase. His books have sold over two million copies and include The Complete Guide to the Bible and Who’s and Where’s Where in the Bible.

Reader Interactions

Comments

  1. Wayne Sacchi

    April 19, 2016 at 7:25 am

    I like to watch those shows too — many of these brilliant archeologists have agendas and some of their conclusions have been proven false on so many things (e.g.. David was a legend, no King Ahaseurus, etc.).

    My biggest complaint is with the modern critics like Bart Ehrmans and John Dominic Crosson who make statements about the “errors” of the Bible without ever taking into consideration Church history that contradicts what they are saying. I have seen many make “shipwreck” of their faith listening to this godless garbage.

    Yes, Christians need to look at everything (we got great sources out there), but being a man of faith I know that God is and has revealed himself in his word!

    Reply
    • Stephen M. Miller

      April 19, 2016 at 9:36 am

      Yep. Thanks Wayne.

      Reply
  2. Steve

    April 19, 2016 at 8:19 am

    Growing up in the evangelical fundamentalist church, I too was taught that you NEVER question the Bible, that it was confirmed over centuries by “great men of God.” However, I must say that I’m fascinated when I explore new information, translations and blogs (like yours) that make me realize that various teachings in my past may not be on point. And I can clearly state that my faith has not been “shipwrecked.”

    That being said, I can also understand the need for many to feel the security of their Bible and doctrines bound up in one nice, neat little package. Therefore, I am careful in how I discuss Biblical matters with them. I acknowledge that I may be wrong, and I emphasize the need to follow Jesus and his teaching.

    Reply
    • Stephen M. Miller

      April 19, 2016 at 9:35 am

      “Careful” is the way to go no matter who we’re talking with about religion…or politics.

      Reply
  3. Harvey

    April 22, 2016 at 1:03 pm

    I think you offer great wisdom when you say, “we should stop listening to people who tell us what they think. I say we should gather as many facts as we can and then think for ourselves.”.

    I also I think we have to give The Bible lots hermeneutical leeway, not because of how it’s written, but because of the limitations of our own of historical and literary comprehension.

    The Bible always deals in truth, whether that truth is given literally, figuratively, metaphorically, analogously, or in any other prose or poetic form. Our greatest difficulty seems to be figuring out how the truth of these messages should be read, received, understood, and shared.

    When Jesus delivered a message using a parable, He did so with a specific purpose in mind, but the underlying truth was not effected, even if some of His audience lacked the ability to follow contextually.

    Unfortunately, it’s really hard to have meaningful and respectful dialogue about The Bible, as you thoughtfully suggest, when we can’t even agree on how the words we see with our eyes should be interpreted in our minds and stored within our hearts.

    Your blog and your writing are a tremendous blessing. Please keep up the good work!

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sidebar

Casual English Bible Website

Featured Book

Complete Guide to the Bible

Complete Guide to the Bible
Buy from Amazon
Buy from Books-A-Million
Buy from Christian Book Distributor
Buy from Google Play

Latest Posts

  • I do one thing better than God May 27, 2025
  • When our faith glitches May 5, 2025
  • Job is the right book for me now April 16, 2025

  • Home
  • About
  • Blog Features
  • Books
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy

  • YouTube
  • Instagram
  • LinkedIn

Copyright © 2025 · Stephen M. Miller · All Rights Reserved

Privacy & Cookies: This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this website, you agree to their use. To find out more, including how to control cookies, see here: Cookie Policy
Reject AllAccept All
Manage consent

Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may affect your browsing experience.
Necessary
Always Enabled
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. These cookies ensure basic functionalities and security features of the website, anonymously.
CookieDurationDescription
cookielawinfo-checkbox-analytics11 monthsThis cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Analytics".
cookielawinfo-checkbox-functional11 monthsThe cookie is set by GDPR cookie consent to record the user consent for the cookies in the category "Functional".
cookielawinfo-checkbox-necessary11 monthsThis cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookies is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Necessary".
cookielawinfo-checkbox-others11 monthsThis cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Other.
cookielawinfo-checkbox-performance11 monthsThis cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Performance".
viewed_cookie_policy11 monthsThe cookie is set by the GDPR Cookie Consent plugin and is used to store whether or not user has consented to the use of cookies. It does not store any personal data.
Functional
Functional cookies help to perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collect feedbacks, and other third-party features.
Performance
Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.
Analytics
Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.
Advertisement
Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with relevant ads and marketing campaigns. These cookies track visitors across websites and collect information to provide customized ads.
Others
Other uncategorized cookies are those that are being analyzed and have not been classified into a category as yet.
SAVE & ACCEPT
%d