STEVE:
ChatGPT:
Why Scholars Accept Jesus as Historical
1. Multiple Independent Sources
2. Criterion of Embarrassment
3. Crucifixion by the Romans
Scholarly Debate
-
- Secular historians often describe him as a Jewish apocalyptic preacher.
The “mythicist” position (that Jesus never existed) is considered a fringe view and is not taken seriously by most credentialed historians. Figures like Bart Ehrman (agnostic New Testament scholar) and John Dominic Crossan (historian of early Christianity) argue that the evidence for Jesus’ existence is much stronger than that for most figures of antiquity.
Steve’s other crucifixion videos
- 2.6 million views
Crucifixion Q: Did the Body of Jesus Rot on the Cross
- 89,700 views
Peace to you
Well, there you go. Have a great day out there, folks, as best you can.
I know there’s a lot of insanity going on. If you want to read what ChatGPT says about that, check out this incredibly engaging blog post. If you start reading it, you’ll finish it. The thing is that surprising.
PS about Mom
Hey, here’s one very personal piece of info. It’s in a video I just released about my visit with Mom who has dementia and is blind from a stroke. I struggled for months before the visit to find a way to connect with her. But I found it.
A song for Mom
Peace to you.
—Steve
“Jesus wasn’t real”
I’ve read a bit on the topic
“You’re a Sunday School scholar”
Was Jesus real?