A READER SURPRISED ME with a Bible question a few days ago.
Here’s the question. It comes from a gent I’ll identify only as Larry, since I don’t have his permission to use his name:
I’d love to hear any of your comments on I Samuel 16….Samuel was instructed by God to anoint a son of Jesse as the new king. He balks in fear. God gets the result he needs by constructing a half-truth.
I didn’t know what Larry was talking about at first. I couldn’t imagine God telling a lie of any kind. People tell lies, generally, because they’re afraid of someone finding out the truth. It’s hard for me to imagine God being afraid.
As it turns out, God is not the one who is afraid in this story. The prophet Samuel is afraid.
God has decided to no longer back Saul as king of Israel. God has his eye on a young boy who isn’t grown-up yet. The boy is David, son of a Bethlehem shepherd named Jesse.
God tells Samuel to go down to Bethlehem and essentially pre-anoint David as Israel’s future king.
In other words, commit treason.
“I can’t do that,” said Samuel. “Saul will hear about it and kill me” (1 Samuel 16:2).
God, like an operative of the CIA, develops a cover story:
“Take a calf with you,” the Lord replied. “Tell everyone that you’ve come to offer it as a sacrifice to me, then invite Jesse to the sacrifice” (1 Samuel 16:2-3).
But we all know why Samuel is really going to Bethlehem. He’s not going there to kill a cow. He’s going there to crown a king.
Did God lie? Some Bible experts call it subterfuge, which is pretty much the same thing as a lie, with more syllables. It is certainly deception. Perhaps Larry described it best when he called it a half-truth. It was only half the truth. Samuel was going to kill a cow in Bethlehem, alright. But killing a cow in Bethlehem is not the reason he was going there.
There are Bible questions that sometimes cost me sleep. This is not one of them.
God was protecting his frightened prophet. He did it by creating a cover story that was actually authentic. Samuel killed the cow in Bethlehem. Jesse’s family helped him eat the cow. Then Samuel crowned the king. It all seems good to me.
A tougher question is what do we do with this today? Is it okay to use deception to get the job done when the deception could help protect vulnerable people?
The first example that comes to mind is from warfare: President Ronald Reagan denying to news media that a military operation was underway when, in fact, United States military forces were invading Grenada to stop a Communist coup. He lied about that 1983 Operation Urgent Fury, and he did it to protect the troops.
What about something closer to home. Let’s say you’ve got a wedding coming up. And you’ve got some relatives who expect an invitation, but you don’t want them to come because though you love them you know they are a black hole that will suck the joy out of the room.
Would God be okay with deception as a way to keep your wedding happy and your relatives feeling something other than rejected?
Would it be so bad to “forget” to send them an invitation?
Then when they call, tell them you sent it?
And then when they call once again to tell you they never got it but they are coming is it okay to tell them you are sorry – they are welcome to come to the wedding, but every seat is taken at the reception?
What do you think?
Is that how you kill a cow today?
TT
Your examples are not the same thing because you are actually telling a lie to have your way. By you saying you sent an invitation in the post when in fact you did not is a lie. In the Bible passage above God never lied as He is not a God to lie nor was there any deception because Samuel was still going to make the sacrifice as directed by God, He just did not reveal the whole truth which is indeed wisdom as we have to learn to keep somethings to our self. A suitable example to use in regards to the wedding could be, you changing the venue size and saying that due to the capacity of the new venue you do not have any more invites to give out. Although your initial reason is to restrict unwanted guest, you have not lied in your explanation as the wedding venue will not be able to hold them all if invited. I hope this makes sense.
Stephen M. Miller
Sure, it makes sense. Still, Samuel is going to see David’s family under false pretenses, not true explanations.
There are other times in the Bible when God is even more bluntly implicated with telling a lie, as reported. The prophet Micaiah said a divine lie was responsible for killing evil King Ahab. Ahab’s prophets said he would win the war. But he died of wounds. Micaiah said, “So, now you know. It was the LORD who seduced the prophets to lie. The LORD convinced the prophets into giving the king this disastrous recommendation.” (1 Kings 22:23). The parallel story is in 2 Chronicles 18:2-27
We probably need to lighten up on how literally we approach and dissect the Bible. It has traveled across the centuries on the fingers of many human beings.